Watch climate exposure in context.
Explore physical and transition risk with scenario assumptions, geographic exposure, and capital-path context. Public climate references and synthetic portfolio examples remain clearly identified.
Illustrative product demo · Synthetic institutional data · Includes public climate reference data
Read the view
Inspect climate exposure with assumptions in view.
Climate-risk analysis becomes useful when physical and transition assumptions are visible beside portfolio context. The climate view distinguishes public historical indicators from synthetic portfolio examples, then frames scenario review through labels such as NGFS horizon, ECL impact, capital path, and portfolio exposure. RYNTA places those references inside the same source-data, calculation, validation, approval, and evidence path used elsewhere in RiskOps, while making clear that public climate history is not the same thing as portfolio loss.
Physical and transition lens
Separate hazard-driven physical risk from transition assumptions such as policy, capital path, and ECL movement.
NGFS horizon
Read the selected horizon and scenario lens before comparing geography, exposure bands, or portfolio concentration.
Public reference indicators
Historical climate indicators support context; they are not equivalent to institution-specific loss or capital impact.
Synthetic portfolio mapping
Portfolio examples, exposure bands, and affected segments remain demonstration data until an institution defines scope and inputs.
Validation and approval context
Mapping, assumptions, partial calculation limits, reviewer questions, and evidence travel with the output.
Review workflow
Example: reviewing a climate concentration question.
In an illustrative review, a risk team wants to understand whether a portfolio segment has higher climate exposure under a selected scenario lens. RYNTA brings together public climate reference values, synthetic portfolio examples, scenario assumptions, and review notes. The agentic layer can help collect context and draft the explanation. The controlled path keeps the official calculation boundary separate, asks AVI to review mapping and assumptions, and keeps unresolved questions visible for the human reviewer.
Open the climate view
Inspect regional exposure bands and compare the scenario assumption with the portfolio segment.
Review before escalation
Check validation notes before deciding whether the issue needs escalation, further analysis, or no immediate action.
Attach the challenge
If the public source, mapping rule, or scenario assumption is challenged, that challenge stays attached to the output.
Evidence bundle
Keep the climate view reviewable after the meeting.
Climate-risk work becomes difficult to review when the map, scenario assumption, source note, and approval discussion live in different places. The handoff carries the climate view together with the assumptions and evidence used to interpret it. RYNTA preserves enough context for a later reviewer to understand what was shown, which public references informed it, how synthetic portfolio examples were mapped, what AVI challenged, and what accountable people decided.
Climate package
Scenario lens, geography, portfolio segment context, and source note separating public references from synthetic data.
Review notes
Mapping and assumption notes, unresolved validation checks, and reviewer question log.
Reviewer handoff
Approval or escalation state with evidence retention and access controls defined by the institution.
Review the workflow with your team.
Policy interpretation, review, and approval remain with authorized people. Production scope, integrations, and controls are agreed per institution.
Request a demo ↗